
Audra — I
1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
Missing cycle · location & information sought
Six paintings by Mikalojus Konstantinas Čiurlionis. The complete cycle is listed as missing in the current Čiurlionis digital catalogue. We are attempting to reconstruct its later provenance and determine whether any of the original works survive in an institutional or private collection.

Priority acquisition
Up to €200,000 is available for acquisition of the complete original Audra cycle. If an individual original panel survives, acquisition can be discussed separately.
Any transaction would be subject to expert authentication, documented provenance and clear lawful title. Information is equally welcome where acquisition is not possible.
The offer is made for original works only, not reproductions, later copies or photographic material.
Research notice
We are seeking credible information about the original six paintings: museum or archive references, inventory numbers, collection photographs, labels, exhibition records, correspondence, or private-family documentation. Even a fragmentary lead may help reconnect the provenance.
This is primarily a location and information search. If one of the works is held privately and lawful ownership can be established, confidential acquisition enquiries may also be considered.
The official M. K. Čiurlionis digital catalogue describes Audra as a missing six-painting cycle and dates it to 1904. The cycle was first exhibited that year at the Warsaw School of Art. The same catalogue states that it once belonged to the Warsaw art school and that its present location is unknown.
Stasys Čiurlionis later recalled that before the artist handed the cycle to the school, he made a repetition or copy of it. A painting titled Audra now held by the Lithuanian National Museum of Art has been suggested as possibly belonging to that repeated version, rather than to the missing original sequence.
The lost cycle can still be studied because its imagery survived photographically. The current catalogue states that the sequence has been reconstructed from surviving negatives by photographer Aleksandras Jurašaitis (1859–1915) and from the recollections of contemporaries. Scholarly research on Čiurlionis photography likewise notes that the cycle disappeared in Warsaw and is known from Jurašaitis's photographic negatives.
No public record currently establishes where the original six paintings went after their Warsaw period. That is the question this research file is intended to pursue.
Sources: M. K. Čiurlionis digital catalogue, “Storm. Cycle of 6 paintings” and “Missing paintings”; research on Aleksandras Jurašaitis and the photographic documentation of Čiurlionis's lost works. The current museum catalogue dates the cycle to 1904; some older cataloguing has used 1905.
The six photographs below are arranged in the sequence used by the current Čiurlionis digital catalogue. Click any image to open the archival reproduction at full size.

1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
1904 · missing · archival reproduction
Archival reproduction. Source: M. K. Čiurlionis National Museum of Art / ciurlionis.eu.
Comments & research notes
Share what you know
If you recognise one of these compositions or know of an archival, institutional or private-collection reference, you can leave a note anonymously.
Loading comments…
Public comments are contributions from visitors and do not represent The Missing Canvas. Inaccurate, abusive or inappropriate comments may be removed.